Etiqueta: Espartaco: Roma amenazada

¡Prepárese para el gran final! Nuestra introducción histórica a Espartaco: Roma amenazada concluye con un dramático enfrentamiento que le dejará en vilo.

Don’t miss out on this thrilling conclusion! Read the previous chapters here and prepare to be captivated by the story of Spartacus.
– Parte 1
– Parte 2
– Parte 3

After suppressing Quintus Sertorius’s rebellion in Hispania, Pompey’s legions were returning to Italy. While sources differ on whether Crassus had specifically requested reinforcements, the Senate seized the opportunity of Pompey’s return to Italy and ordered him to bypass Rome and head south to assist Crassus in suppressing the slave revolt. To further bolster Crassus’s forces, the Senate also dispatched reinforcements under the command of Marcus Terentius Varro Lucullus, the proconsul of Macedonia.

Apprehended by the prospect of losing credit for the war to the arriving reinforcements, Crassus intensified his efforts to swiftly quell the slave revolt. Spartacus, anticipating Pompey’s approach, attempted to negotiate an end to the conflict with Crassus but was met with refusal.

As a result, Spartacus and his army broke through the Roman fortifications and retreated towards the Bruttium peninsula, followed closely by Crassus’s legions. In a skirmish with a portion of Spartacus’s army led by Gannicus and Castus, Crassus’s forces inflicted a significant defeat, killing 12,300 rebels.

Despite heavy losses, Crassus’ legions were struggling to contain Spartacus’s rebel army. The Roman cavalry, led by Lucius Quinctius, was ambushed and annihilated by escaping slaves. As the rebels’ morale faltered, they began to splinter, launching desperate attacks against Crassus’ forces.

En una última y desesperada batalla en el río Silarius, Espartaco, el legendario gladiador convertido en líder rebelde, hizo un gesto dramático que simbolizaba su inquebrantable determinación. Mató a su caballo delante de sus tropas, declarando que la victoria traería más caballos, pero que la muerte los haría innecesarios. Este acto, tal vez imbuido de un significado ritual, marcó el tono del baño de sangre subsiguiente.

Espartaco avanzó con intenciones feroces, abriendo una brecha en las filas enemigas. Se creía que su objetivo final era Craso, el general romano que lideraba las fuerzas enemigas. Sin embargo, a pesar de sus valientes esfuerzos, Espartaco cayó bajo una lluvia de flechas y su cuerpo quedó irreconocible en medio de la carnicería. La victoria romana fue decisiva, y Craso, para infundir miedo a los posibles rebeldes, ordenó la crucifixión de 6.000 prisioneros supervivientes a lo largo de la Vía Apia. Aunque los historiadores antiguos afirmaron que Espartaco pereció en la batalla, su cuerpo nunca fue recuperado. La Tercera Guerra Servil llegó a su fin con la victoria decisiva de Craso.

The war, however, was not yet over. Numerous fugitives attempted to escape northward, only to be intercepted by Pompey’s army in Etruria. Pompey’s annihilation of these remnants of the rebellion secured his own claim to fame and overshadowed Crassus’s earlier victory. He boasted that while Crassus had defeated the slaves in battle, he had eradicated the war’s very roots.

Despite his defeat and death, Spartacus’s legacy endured. His name became synonymous with rebellion and resistance, a symbol of hope for the oppressed. While Crassus and Pompey, the victorious generals, eventually met tragic ends, Spartacus’s memory lived on as a mythical hero of freedom.

La Tercera Guerra Servil fue el último gran levantamiento de esclavos de la historia romana. Roma no experimentaría otra rebelión de esta magnitud en los siglos venideros.

Third chapter of a 4-part series on Spartacus: Rome Under Threat. If you haven’t read the previous parts you can check it out here:
– Parte 1
– Parte 2

Despite conflicting accounts in ancient sources, it’s generally agreed that Spartacus and his followers were based in southern Italy by early 71 BC. Faced with this escalating rebellion, the Roman Senate appointed Marcus Licinius Crassus to quell the uprising. A veteran of Sulla’s civil war, Crassus commanded a substantial army of approximately 32,000 to 48,000 Roman infantry and auxiliaries. Known for his harsh discipline, Crassus revived the practice of decimation, executing one-tenth of a unit as punishment for cowardice or failure.

As Spartacus’ forces advanced northward, Crassus deployed six legions along the region’s borders. The initial confrontation occurred near Picenum according to Plutarch, while Appian places it in Samnium. Crassus dispatched two legions under Mummius to outflank Spartacus but forbade them from engaging. Despite these orders, Mummius attacked and was defeated. However, Crassus subsequently engaged Spartacus and achieved a decisive victory, inflicting approximately 6,000 casualties on the rebel army.

The tide turned in Crassus’ favor, with his legions winning several more battles and forcing Spartacus to retreat south through Lucania to the straits near Messina. According to Plutarch, Spartacus negotiated with Cilician pirates to transport him and 2,000 of his men to Sicily, where he planned to instigate a slave revolt. However, the pirates betrayed him, taking payment and abandoning the rebels. While minor sources mention attempts at raft and shipbuilding by the rebels, Crassus prevented their escape to Sicily.
Spartacus’ forces retreated to Rhegium, followed by Crassus’ legions. Crassus fortified the isthmus at Rhegium, effectively besieging the rebels and cutting off their supplies.

Continue reading part 4…

It is time for the second chapter of a 4-part series on Spartacus: Rome Under Threat. If you haven’t read the first part you can check it out here:
– Parte 1

En la primavera del 72 a.C., los esclavos fugitivos abandonaron sus campamentos de invierno y se dirigieron al norte, hacia la Galia Cisalpina.

Alarmed by the rebellion’s scale and the defeats of praetorian armies under Glaber and Varinius, the Senate dispatched two consular legions commanded by Lucius Gellius and Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Clodianus. Initially triumphant, Gellius engaged around 30,000 slaves led by Crixus near Mount Garganus, decimating the rebels, and killing Crixus.

At this point, classical accounts diverge, reconverging only with Crassus’s involvement. Appian and Plutarch offer comprehensive, yet disparate narratives. Neither directly contradicts the other, but each presents unique events while omitting elements from the opposing account.

Appian’s Account
Appian portrays the victory over Crixus as the prelude to a complex series of maneuvers nearly bringing Spartacus’s forces to Rome. Following Crixus’s defeat, Gellius pursued Spartacus’s main force towards Cisalpine Gaul, while Lentulus blocked their path. Spartacus defeated Lentulus, then turned to crush Gellius, scattering the Roman legions. Appian claims Spartacus executed 300 captured Romans, forcing them to fight to the death as gladiators, avenging Crixus.

With 120,000 followers, Spartacus rapidly pushed north, burning supplies, killing prisoners, and slaughtering pack animals to accelerate his advance. The defeated consuls retreated to Rome, while Spartacus’s army pressed on. Another consular defeat at Picenum followed. Appian suggests Spartacus initially intended to march on Rome but changed course due to inadequate armament and lack of allied cities, retreating to southern Italy. The rebels seized Thurii, plundered the region, traded for arms, and clashed with repeatedly defeated Roman forces.

Plutarch’s Account
Plutarch offers a contrasting narrative. After Gellius’s victory over Crixus (described as “Germans”), Spartacus defeated Lentulus, seized Roman supplies, and advanced into northern Italy. The Senate recalled both consuls. Unlike Appian, Plutarch omits Spartacus’s engagement with Gellius and the Picenum battle. Plutarch details a conflict absent from Appian: Spartacus’s army advanced towards Mutina (modern Modena), where a Roman force led by Gaius Cassius Longinus was defeated. Plutarch then fast-forwards to Crassus’s initial clash with Spartacus in the spring of 71 BC, ignoring Appian’s Rome march and Thurii retreat. As Plutarch describes Crassus forcing Spartacus’s retreat from Picenum in 71 BC, it implies a winter withdrawal from Mutina to southern or central Italy. The reasons for this retreat, given the apparent opportunity to cross the Alps, remain unexplained.

Varias teorías sugieren que Espartaco y su ejército podrían haber reconsiderado su ruta de huida, optando por regresar al sur en lugar de la peligrosa travesía de los Alpes. Estas posibilidades incluyen la naturaleza desalentadora de los Alpes, el encanto embriagador de conquistar Roma después de victorias anteriores, o divisiones internas dentro de la rebelión que hicieron necesario un cambio de planes.

Continue reading part 3…

Prepárese para desempolvar sus sandalias y adentrarse en el corazón de la antigua Roma.
Our game designer, José Manuel Neva, brings you the first chapter of a 4-part series on Spartacus: Rome Under Threat. Get ready to be immersed in this epic adventure through history!

La esclavitud era una piedra angular de la economía romana, ya que proporcionaba una mano de obra vasta y barata adquirida a través del comercio y la conquista. La inmensa y oprimida población esclava desencadenó múltiples rebeliones. Aunque la Primera y la Segunda Guerras Serviles en Sicilia fueron disturbios importantes sofocados por el poderío militar romano, no se percibieron como amenazas existenciales para la República.

This perception shifted with the Third Servile War. In the spring of 73 BC, a group of 74 to 78 gladiators staged a violent escape from Lentulus Batiatus’ gladiatorial school in Capua. Defeating a Roman force, they seized military equipment and, with growing numbers, established a base on Mount Vesuvius.

Led by Spartacus and his formidable lieutenants, Crixus and Oenomaus, the revolt and subsequent raids swiftly captured the attention of the Roman authorities. Initially dismissed as a large-scale criminal outbreak rather than a full-blown rebellion, the uprising among the enslaved population posed a direct threat to the elite’s cherished estates and vacation retreats.

By late that same year, Rome responded by dispatching a military force under the command of a praetor. Gaius Claudius Glaber assembled a hastily gathered militia of 3,000 men (ad tumultum), a far cry from the disciplined legions. Underestimating the severity of the situation, Rome viewed the conflict as little more than a banditry problem. Glaber’s strategy was simple: besiege the rebels on Mount Vesuvius and starve them into submission.

However, Spartacus and his followers proved to be a formidable adversary. Despite their lack of formal military training, they demonstrated remarkable ingenuity and tactical acumen. Utilizing the natural resources of Vesuvius, they fashioned ropes and ladders from vines and trees, enabling a daring escape down the mountain’s treacherous cliffs. Seizing the opportunity presented by Glaber’s lack of a defensive encampment, the rebels outflanked his forces, inflicting a crushing defeat.

A second Roman force, led by Praetor Publius Varinius, was subsequently dispatched to quell Spartacus’ rebellion. Inexplicably, Varinius divided his army, placing Furius and Cossinius in command of separate contingents. While Plutarch indicates Furius commanded approximately 2,000 soldiers, the overall size of the expeditionary force and its composition—militia or legionaries—remains uncertain. These Roman troops were decisively defeated by the rebel slaves. Cossinius was killed, Varinius narrowly escaped capture, and the Romans lost their equipment.

These victories propelled Spartacus’ army to new heights. Tens of thousands of additional slaves joined their ranks, as did numerous local herdsmen and shepherds. By the winter of 73-72 BC, the rebel force had swelled to an estimated 70,000 strong. This period was marked by intensive training, armament, and expansion of their territory, which now included the cities of Nola, Nuceria, Thurii, and Metapontum.

Sin embargo, estos triunfos no fueron gratuitos. Oenomaus, un destacado líder rebelde, pereció, presumiblemente en combate cuando los ejércitos esclavistas saqueaban ciudades y pueblos del sur de Italia.

Continue reading part 2…